Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Laguna M.1 scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.7 in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 41.4 to 36.4.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 37.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 205K |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | 1397 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1422 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.84 |
Math MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | 3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1420 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1443 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1439 |
| LMArena French | — | 1422 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1261 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1403 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1404 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1419 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1413 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than MiniMax-M2.7?
MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and MiniMax-M2.7 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.