Noometry

Model comparison

Command R+ vs MiniMax-M2.7

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax

37.7

Rank #196 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.7 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 58.9 to 43.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Vectara Hallucination Rate: 6.9% for Command R+ and 12.9% for MiniMax-M2.7.
  • MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • MiniMax-M2.7 accepts more context: 205K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command R+MiniMax-M2.7
ProviderCohereMiniMax
Noometry Index32.437.7
Released2024-08-302026-03-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K205K
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$10$1.20
Results tracked3430

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Coding11871454
LMArena WebDev—1398
SciCode—47%
WeirdML—37%
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
ALE-Bench—599.25
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command R+: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax-M2.7
Terminal-Bench—45.1%
ExploitBench—13.3%
GBAEval—0%

Reasoning MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Hard Prompts11861422
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34145.85
SimpleBench17.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)—24.7%
CritPt—0.6%
Thematic Generalization—39.3%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Command R+ leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Math11881420
ProofBench—3%
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax-M2.7
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%12.9%
LMArena Expert11741444
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Non-English12161382
LMArena Chinese12261441
LMArena French12091421
LMArena German12161398
LMArena Japanese11661262
LMArena Korean11381313
LMArena Russian12271383
LMArena Spanish11891403

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Instruction Following11971405
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Longer Query12301419

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Text12291405
LMArena Creative Writing12351354
LMArena Multi-Turn12131412
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-M2.7 does, with 205K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper