Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Llama 2-13B
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Laguna M.1 leads 23.1 to 12.8.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 29.6 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1062 |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1051 |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 106.17 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |
Math Llama 2-13B leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1065 |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 2-13B: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1001 |
| LMArena French | — | 1044 |
| LMArena German | — | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1087 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1045 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1064 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1050 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Llama 2-13B?
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Llama 2-13B better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Llama 2-13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.