Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Laguna M.1
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
PoolsideSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Laguna M.1 leads 36.4 to 28.9.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300), Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1348 |
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275), Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237), Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Laguna M.1?
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Laguna M.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.