Model comparison

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Wizardlm 13b

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

41.2

Rank #140 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 62.3 to 30.5.

Side by side

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Wizardlm 13b specifications
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 13b
ProviderMoonshot AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index41.231.4
Released2025-07-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.57—
Output $ / M tokens$2.30—
Results tracked4210

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding13991035
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)63.4%—
Aider Polyglot59.1%—
GSO4.9%—
WeirdML42.8%—
ALE-Bench597.5—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64), Wizardlm 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 13b
Terminal-Bench35.7%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard59.1%—
METR Time Horizons59.2%—

Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts13841018
SimpleBench26.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark64.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.01—
ForecastBench60.2—

Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Math13971017
Omni-MATH65.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)21.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157), Wizardlm 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 13b
MMLU-Pro81.9%—
Confabulations20.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate17.9%—
GPQA (HELM)65.3%—
LMArena Expert1365—

Multilingual Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English13721034
LMArena Chinese14151023
LMArena French1379—
LMArena German1387—
LMArena Japanese1349—
LMArena Korean1325—
LMArena Russian1385—
LMArena Spanish1386—

Instruction Following Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following13481048
IFEval85%—

Long Context Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query13531054
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—
CL-bench17.6%—

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Text13801077
LMArena Creative Writing13501091
LMArena Multi-Turn13711047
Short-Story Creative Writing85.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1666—
WildBench86.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Wizardlm 13b?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper