Model comparison
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Qwen-14B
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 62.3 to 27.6.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-07-12 | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.57 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.30 | — |
| Results tracked | 42 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1399 | 1071 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 63.4% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 59.1% | — |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 42.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 597.5 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.7% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 59.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 59.2% | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1384 | 1027 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.01 | 113.03 |
| SimpleBench | 26.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 64.4% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| ForecastBench | 60.2 | — |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1397 | 1068 |
| Omni-MATH | 65.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 21.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 81.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 20.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 17.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1365 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1415 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1379 | — |
| LMArena German | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1386 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1348 | 1031 |
| IFEval | 85% | — |
Long Context Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1353 | 1028 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
| CL-bench | 17.6% | — |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1380 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1371 | 1022 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 85.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1666 | — |
| WildBench | 86.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Qwen-14B?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Qwen-14B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.