Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Qwen-14B
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 27.6.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1071 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1031 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Qwen-14B?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Qwen-14B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.