Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Trinity Large Thinking
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Arcee AISummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 32.5 to 16.9.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 80K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | 1238 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1381 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1366 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1360 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | 1357 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1334 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1355 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1342 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Trinity Large Thinking?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Trinity Large Thinking share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.