Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 35.0.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1319 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1302 |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1316 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1273 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1275 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.4 vs 38.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.