Model comparison
Qwen3.5 Max Preview vs Trinity Large Thinking
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
Arcee AISummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 30.8 to 16.9.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 38.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 80K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1487 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1483 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1474 | 1366 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1489 | 1360 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1465 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1534 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1484 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1487 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1495 | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | 1438 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1471 | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1470 | 1357 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1467 | 1334 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1476 | 1355 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1470 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1464 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1478 | 1342 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.5 Max Preview better than Trinity Large Thinking?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen3.5 Max Preview or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 Max Preview and Trinity Large Thinking share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.