Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 vs Wizardlm 13b
Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 leads 65.1 to 30.5.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 48.1 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-01-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.45 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 51 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 48.8 (#53), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1474 | 1035 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.8% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 70.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1437 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 67.3% | — |
| SciCode | 49% | — |
| WeirdML | 45.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 821.65 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.5: 34.2 (#48), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 43.2% | — |
| OSWorld | 63.3% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 1,198 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#80), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1018 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 11.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.8% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 78.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 69.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 65.3% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.03 | — |
Math Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 51.8 (#53), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1017 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 62.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 92.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 27.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#56), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 24.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 14.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1466 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5: 41.1 (#39), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1430 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 53.9 (#53), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1433 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1454 | — |
| LMArena German | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1410 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 75.3 (#64), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1431 | 1048 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 1054 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 86.1% | — |
| CL-bench | 19.3% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 13.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 65.1 (#53), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1423 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | 1047 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1579 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 better than Wizardlm 13b?
Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.8 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.