Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen-14B
Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 leads 65.1 to 27.6.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 48.1 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-01-27 | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.45 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 51 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 48.8 (#53), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1474 | 1071 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.8% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 70.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1437 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 67.3% | — |
| SciCode | 49% | — |
| WeirdML | 45.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 821.65 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.5: 34.2 (#48), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 43.2% | — |
| OSWorld | 63.3% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 1,198 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#80), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1027 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.03 | 113.03 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 11.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.8% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 78.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 69.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 65.3% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 69.4% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 51.8 (#53), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1068 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 62.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 92.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 27.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#56), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 24.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 14.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1466 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5: 41.1 (#39), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1430 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 53.9 (#53), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1433 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1454 | — |
| LMArena German | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1410 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 75.3 (#64), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1431 | 1031 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 1028 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 86.1% | — |
| CL-bench | 19.3% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 13.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 65.1 (#53), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1423 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | 1022 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1579 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 better than Qwen-14B?
Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.8 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 and Qwen-14B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.