Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 vs Palm 2

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI

48.1

Rank #57 Confirmed

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 leads 65.1 to 25.6.
  • Kimi K2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Kimi K2.5 and Palm 2 specifications
Kimi K2.5Palm 2
ProviderMoonshot AIGoogle
Noometry Index48.130.0
Released2026-01-27—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.45—
Output $ / M tokens$2.25—
Results tracked5110

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 48.8 (#53), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Palm 2
LMArena Coding1474994
SWE-bench Verified73.8%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)70.8%—
LMArena WebDev1437—
SWE-bench Multilingual67.3%—
SciCode49%—
WeirdML45.6%—
ALE-Bench821.65—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2.5: 34.2 (#48), Palm 2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Palm 2
Terminal-Bench43.2%—
OSWorld63.3%—
Vending-Bench 21,198—

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#80), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Palm 2
LMArena Hard Prompts14531005
ARC-AGI-211.8%—
SimpleBench46.8%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark78.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)69.9%—
ARC-AGI-165.3%—
CritPt3.1%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
EnigmaEval3.4%—
Thematic Generalization69.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.03—

Math Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 51.8 (#53), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

Knowledge Not comparable

Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#56), Palm 2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Palm 2
GPQA Diamond87.6%—
Humanity's Last Exam24.4%—
SimpleQA Verified34.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate14.2%—
LMArena Expert1466—

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2.5: 41.1 (#39), Palm 2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Palm 2
LMArena Vision1269—
LMArena Document1430—

Multilingual Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 53.9 (#53), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Palm 2
LMArena Non-English1433916
LMArena Chinese1495887
LMArena French1454—
LMArena German1441—
LMArena Japanese1421—
LMArena Korean1410—
LMArena Russian1435—
LMArena Spanish1450—

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 75.3 (#64), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Palm 2
LMArena Instruction Following14311010

Long Context Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Palm 2
LMArena Longer Query14451010
Fiction.LiveBench86.1%—
CL-bench19.3%—
CL-bench Life13.2%—

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 65.1 (#53), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Palm 2
LMArena Text14451027
LMArena Creative Writing1423991
LMArena Multi-Turn1444994
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1579—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.5 better than Palm 2?

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.5 or Palm 2 better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.8 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper