Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

29.5

Rank #295 Confirmed

Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI

47.8

Rank #50 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 leads 65.3 to 27.2.

Side by side

Gemma 7BKimi K2.5
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Noometry Index29.547.8
Released2024-02-212026-01-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.45
Output $ / M tokens—$2.25
Results tracked2751

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290), Kimi K2.5: 48.7 (#48)

BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2.5
LMArena Coding10481474
SWE-bench Verified—73.8%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—70.8%
LMArena WebDev—1436
SWE-bench Multilingual—67.3%
SciCode—49%
WeirdML—45.6%
ALE-Bench—821.65
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, Kimi K2.5: 34.0 (#44)

BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2.5
Terminal-Bench—43.2%
OSWorld—63.3%
Vending-Bench 2—1,198

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247), Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#74)

BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts10421454
Epoch Capabilities Index111.74148.05
ARC-AGI-2—11.8%
SimpleBench—46.8%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—78.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—69.9%
ARC-AGI-1—65.3%
CritPt—3.1%
Chess Puzzles—12%
EnigmaEval—3.4%
Thematic Generalization—69.4%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
HellaSwag82.2%—
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math Kimi K2.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225), Kimi K2.5: 50.3 (#46)

BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2.5
LMArena Math10661470
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—62.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—92.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—27.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%
GSM8K46.4%—

Knowledge Kimi K2.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248), Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#52)

BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2.5
LMArena Expert10021466
GPQA Diamond—87.6%
Humanity's Last Exam—24.4%
SimpleQA Verified—34.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—14.2%
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, Kimi K2.5: 40.4 (#37)

BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2.5
LMArena Vision—1269
LMArena Document—1430

Multilingual Kimi K2.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282), Kimi K2.5: 54.1 (#50)

BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2.5
LMArena Non-English9991433
LMArena Chinese10351495
LMArena French10241454
LMArena Russian9931436
LMArena German—1441
LMArena Japanese—1422
LMArena Korean—1412
LMArena Spanish—1450

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290), Kimi K2.5: 75.5 (#60)

BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2.5
LMArena Instruction Following10171431

Long Context Kimi K2.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277), Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7)

BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2.5
LMArena Longer Query10221445
Fiction.LiveBench—86.1%
CL-bench—19.3%
CL-bench Life—13.2%

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297), Kimi K2.5: 65.3 (#51)

BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2.5
LMArena Text10561445
LMArena Creative Writing10241423
LMArena Multi-Turn9631444
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1579

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or Kimi K2.5 better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Kimi K2.5 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper