Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs QwQ-32B
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 7 categories and QwQ-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.6 to 50.6.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 39.8 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1325 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1324 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), QwQ-32B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1403 | 1336 |
| LMArena German | 1413 | 1313 |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | 1279 |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | 1354 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
Long Context QwQ-32B leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than QwQ-32B?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or QwQ-32B better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and QwQ-32B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.