Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

43.6

Rank #89 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 2 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 29.7 to 13.7.
  • Kimi K2.5 Instant has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 3 and Kimi K2.5 Instant specifications
Grok 3Kimi K2.5 Instant
ProviderxAIMoonshot AI
Noometry Index39.943.6
Released2025-04-09—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4018

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Coding14321484
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
LMArena WebDev—1404
WeirdML37.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Kimi K2.5 Instant: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Kimi K2.5 Instant
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Hard Prompts14341443
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index138.33—

Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Math13911442
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
Omni-MATH46.4%—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Expert14211440
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 3: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Vision—1254

Multilingual Too close to call

Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Non-English14101406
LMArena Chinese14481449
LMArena French14601403
LMArena German14311413
LMArena Korean13731378
LMArena Russian14161404
LMArena Spanish14171447
LMArena Japanese1387—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Instruction Following14091430
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Longer Query14391435
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Text14261420
LMArena Creative Writing14141381
LMArena Multi-Turn14251427
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.9 vs 42.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper