Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

43.6

Rank #89 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #71 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 60.6.
  • Kimi K2.5 Instant has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Kimi K2.5 Instant and Qwen3.5 Max Preview specifications
Kimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderMoonshot AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.645.3
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1817

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding14841487
LMArena WebDev1404—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts14431483

Math Too close to call

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math14421474

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert14401489

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Vision1254—

Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English14061465
LMArena Chinese14491534
LMArena French14031484
LMArena German14131487
LMArena Korean13781438
LMArena Russian14041471
LMArena Spanish14471470
LMArena Japanese—1495

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following14301467

Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query14351476

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text14201470
LMArena Creative Writing13811464
LMArena Multi-Turn14271478

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 42.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper