Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 61.4.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1487 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1483 |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1430 | 1474 |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1489 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1484 |
| LMArena German | 1399 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | 1470 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1467 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.3 vs 44.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.