Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

43.6

Rank #89 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 40.2.
  • Kimi K2.5 Instant has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Kimi K2.5 Instant and Qwen3.7 Plus specifications
Kimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderMoonshot AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.645.3
Released—2026-06-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked1832

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding14841473
FrontierCode—10.2%
LMArena WebDev1404—
SciCode—45.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2.5 Instant: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts14431460
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.37

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Math14421466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Expert14401467
GPQA Diamond—87.9%

Multimodal Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision12541279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English14061445
LMArena Chinese14491510
LMArena French14031473
LMArena German14131471
LMArena Korean13781415
LMArena Russian14041457
LMArena Spanish14471457
LMArena Japanese—1413

Instruction Following Too close to call

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14301440

Long Context Too close to call

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query14351455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text14201455
LMArena Creative Writing13811439
LMArena Multi-Turn14271460

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper