Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Pixtral Large
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 3 categories and Pixtral Large in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.6 to 32.9.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 32.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | — |
Math Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
Multimodal Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | — |
| LMArena French | 1403 | — |
| LMArena German | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Pixtral Large?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Pixtral Large share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.