Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 39.5 to 19.2.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 32.2 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1210 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1208 |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1443 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1438 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1403 | — |
| LMArena German | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1379 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.