Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Omni vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 40.5 to 19.5.
  • Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Omni and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
MiMo-V2-OmniOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderXiaomiAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index43.632.7
Released2026-03-18—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.28—
Results tracked1816

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14661210

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14451208

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14301208
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1449—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision1228—

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14041160
LMArena Chinese14651192
LMArena Russian14121187
LMArena French1447—
LMArena German1399—
LMArena Japanese1317—
LMArena Korean1355—
LMArena Spanish1434—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14281186
IFEval—78%

Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14421194

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14231218
LMArena Creative Writing13921199
LMArena Multi-Turn14451221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper