Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Llama 3-70B
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 39.4 to 12.8.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 28.8 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1206 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: —, Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 5% |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1195 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| DTBench | — | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.93 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1218 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1149 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.6% |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Llama 3-70B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1403 | 1232 |
| LMArena German | 1413 | 1169 |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | 1241 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1017 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | 1194 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1174 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1223 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Llama 3-70B?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Llama 3-70B better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Llama 3-70B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.