Model comparison
Gemma 4 31B IT vs Llama 3-70B
Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 43.2 to 12.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 73.3% for Gemma 4 31B IT and 4.3% for Llama 3-70B.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 31B IT | Llama 3-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2024-04-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.09 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.34 | — |
| Results tracked | 35 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1459 | 1206 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1366 | — |
| SciCode | 43.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |
| ALE-Bench | 925.5 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 4 31B IT: —, Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 5% |
Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.5% | 35.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1195 |
| DTBench | 82.7% | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.74 | 122.93 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 70.6% | — |
| CritPt | 1.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 53% | — |
| LMCA | 39.3% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 30.6% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |
Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81), Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.3% | 4.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1465 | 1218 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |
Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | 40.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1465 | 1149 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 10.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34), Llama 3-70B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1277 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1425 | — |
Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57), Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1431 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1435 | 1232 |
| LMArena Russian | 1460 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1444 | 1241 |
| LMArena German | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1017 |
Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1194 |
Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1446 | 1174 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1443 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | 1223 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1368 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1120 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Llama 3-70B?
Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Llama 3-70B better for coding?
Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Llama 3-70B share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.