Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Laguna M.1
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
PoolsideSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 3 categories and Laguna M.1 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 39.4 to 21.1.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 32.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | 1349 |
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LMArena Math | 1442 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | — |
| LMArena French | 1403 | — |
| LMArena German | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Laguna M.1?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Laguna M.1 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.