Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3 Max
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 Max leads 38.7 to 21.1.
- Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 43.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2025-09-23 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Max leads
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1448 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.38 |
Math Qwen3 Max leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1446 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1455 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1449 |
| LMArena German | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1462 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1419 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1438 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1446 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen3 Max?
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Qwen3 Max better for coding?
Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen3 Max share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.