Model comparison

Inkling vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #75 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 2 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.2 to 36.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 32.3% for Inkling and 41.2% for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Inkling is cheaper at $1.87 / $4.68 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 66K.

Side by side

Inkling and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
InklingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderThinking Machines LabAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index44.137.7
Released2026-07-152025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window66K262K
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1.87$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$4.68$7.50
Results tracked4125

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Inkling: 34.1 (#229), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena WebDev14121275
WeirdML32.3%41.2%
LMArena Coding14631413
ALE-Bench946461.45
FrontierCode14%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
FrontierSWE4.1%—
SciCode47%—
GSO—4.9%
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Inkling leads

Inkling: 29.5 (#76), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
APEX-Agents33.8%—
τ²-bench Banking25%—

Reasoning Inkling leads

Inkling: 40.6 (#48), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14521372
ARC-AGI-236.5%—
SimpleBench50%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
ARC-AGI-179.5%—
CritPt5.4%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
DTBench87.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.6—

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Inkling: 31.2 (#198), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math14821364
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)33.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench0%—

Knowledge Inkling leads

Inkling: 55.2 (#44), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert14681337
GPQA Diamond88.3%—
SimpleQA Verified40.3%—

Multilingual Inkling leads

Inkling: 54.2 (#49), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English14341345
LMArena Chinese14951356
LMArena French14531394
LMArena German14561324
LMArena Japanese14281309
LMArena Korean14011307
LMArena Russian14301367
LMArena Spanish14421360

Instruction Following Inkling leads

Inkling: 75.3 (#65), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14271356

Long Context Inkling leads

Inkling: 43.9 (#79), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14361379

Writing & Preference Inkling leads

Inkling: 65.5 (#48), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text14431356
LMArena Creative Writing13901333
LMArena Multi-Turn14361365
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1611—
EQ-Bench 41226—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Inkling or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Inkling is cheaper. It lists at $1.87 per million input tokens and $4.68 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Inkling or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.2 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct does, with 262K tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks do Inkling and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper