Model comparison
Hy3 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 46.2.
Side by side
| Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0825 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.33 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1291 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1272 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
Math Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1305 |
Knowledge Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1295 |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1439 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |
Instruction Following Hy3 leads
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1247 |
Long Context Hy3 leads
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hy3 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.