Noometry

Model comparison

Inkling vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 44.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #80 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 31.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 0% for Inkling and 70% for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $1.87 / $4.68 for Inkling.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 66K.

Side by side

InklingMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderThinking Machines LabXiaomi
Noometry Index44.150.3
Released2026-07-152026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window66K1.05M
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.87$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$4.68$0.87
Results tracked4119

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Inkling: 34.5 (#234), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev14131629
SciCode47%60.9%
LMArena Coding14641534
ALE-Bench9461,158
FrontierCode14%—
FrontierSWE4.1%—
WeirdML32.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Inkling: 29.6 (#85), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents33.8%59.5%
τ²-bench Banking25%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Inkling: 40.4 (#56), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2.6-Pro
CritPt5.4%26.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14511512
ARC-AGI-236.5%—
SimpleBench50%—
ARC-AGI-179.5%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
DTBench87.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.54—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Inkling: 31.3 (#225), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProofBench0%70%
LMArena Math14791494
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)33.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—

Knowledge Inkling leads

Inkling: 55.1 (#49), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert14651543
GPQA Diamond88.3%—
SimpleQA Verified40.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Inkling: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Inkling: 54.0 (#52), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English14341474
LMArena Chinese14901529
LMArena Russian14291480
LMArena French1458—
LMArena German1446—
LMArena Japanese1429—
LMArena Korean1404—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Inkling: 75.1 (#71), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14261493

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Inkling: 43.8 (#86), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query14341501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Inkling: 65.2 (#51), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text14411492
LMArena Creative Writing13871468
LMArena Multi-Turn14361464
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1611—
EQ-Bench 41226—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 44.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Inkling or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Inkling lists at $1.87 and $4.68.

Is Inkling or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks do Inkling and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper