Model comparison
Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index. Hy3 costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 46.6.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Hy3 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 46.7 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.13 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.53 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hy3: 46.6 (#60), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1509 | 1618 |
| LMArena Coding | 1465 | 1538 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hy3: 25.0 (#134), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1449 | 1511 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
Math Too close to call
Hy3: 37.4 (#98), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1497 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hy3: 40.2 (#108), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1461 | 1548 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hy3: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1265 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hy3: 53.7 (#60), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1496 | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | 1435 | 1481 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hy3: 75.3 (#68), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1425 | 1490 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hy3: 44.1 (#70), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1443 | 1500 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hy3: 62.5 (#75), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1442 | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1399 | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1463 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index. Hy3 costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.
Is Hy3 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 46.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.