Model comparison
Inkling-Small vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling-Small leads 48.3 to 18.0.
Side by side
| Inkling-Small | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 46.5 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2026-07-15 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 524K | — |
| Max output | 1.05M | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.45 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 33 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 43.3 (#80), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1408 | — |
| SciCode | 48.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1451 | — |
Reasoning Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 39.0 (#53), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 40.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84% | — |
| CritPt | 8.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 18% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1424 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.13 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 44.9 (#65), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 46.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 90% | — |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1453 | — |
Knowledge Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 48.3 (#71), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 19.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Inkling-Small: 38.4 (#59), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1235 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#102), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1458 | — |
| LMArena French | 1438 | — |
| LMArena German | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1426 | — |
Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 73.9 (#112), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#113), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | — |
Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 59.8 (#102), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1330 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1420 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Inkling-Small better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Inkling-Small or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.