Model comparison

Inkling-Small vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling-Small leads 48.3 to 18.0.

Side by side

Inkling-Small and OLMo 2 Furious 13B specifications
Inkling-SmallOLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderThinking Machines LabAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index46.529.2
Released2026-07-152024-12-31
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window524K—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$0.45—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3312

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 43.3 (#80), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena WebDev1408—
SciCode48.7%—
LiveBench Coding—10.4%
LMArena Coding1451—

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 39.0 (#53), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallOLMo 2 Furious 13B
ARC-AGI-240.1%—
ARC-AGI-184%—
CritPt8.3%—
Chess Puzzles18%—
LiveBench Reasoning—16.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1424—
Mystery Game Puzzles6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—20.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index150.13—
LiveBench—22.1%

Math Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 44.9 (#65), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallOLMo 2 Furious 13B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)46.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202590%—
ProofBench6%—
Omni-MATH—15.6%
LiveBench Math—13.6%
LMArena Math1453—

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 48.3 (#71), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallOLMo 2 Furious 13B
GPQA Diamond88.5%—
SimpleQA Verified19.1%—
MMLU-Pro—31%
GPQA (HELM)—31.6%
LMArena Expert1442—

Multimodal Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 38.4 (#59), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Vision1235—

Multilingual Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#102), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1400—
LMArena Chinese1458—
LMArena French1438—
LMArena German1412—
LMArena Japanese1399—
LMArena Korean1355—
LMArena Russian1392—
LMArena Spanish1426—

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 73.9 (#112), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Instruction Following—60.6%
IFEval—73%
LMArena Instruction Following1397—

Long Context Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#113), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Longer Query1401—

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 59.8 (#102), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Text1413—
LMArena Creative Writing1330—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1491—
WildBench—68.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn1420—
LiveBench Language—11.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling-Small better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling-Small or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper