Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs Wizardlm 13b
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 68.9 to 53.7.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 30.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1247 | 1035 |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1018 |
Math Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1017 |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1244 | — |
Multilingual Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1250 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1198 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1221 | 1049 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |
Long Context Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1240 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1243 | 1047 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Wizardlm 13b?
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.