Model comparison
Command A vs Wizardlm 13b
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 5 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.5 to 27.3.
Side by side
| Command A | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Wizardlm 13b leads
Command A: 26.8 (#317), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1035 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.7 (#36), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Command A: 17.7 (#276), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1018 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 33.5 (#172), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command A: 36.5 (#157), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.5 (#166), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.3 (#172), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1049 |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#147), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Command A leads
Command A: 47.8 (#204), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1047 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Wizardlm 13b?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Wizardlm 13b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.