Model comparison

Granite 4.0 H Small vs Mistral Small 3.1

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

36.5

Rank #214 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.7

Rank #269 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 5 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 31.4 to 14.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is IFEval: 89% for Granite 4.0 H Small and 75% for Mistral Small 3.1.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 H Small and Mistral Small 3.1 specifications
Granite 4.0 H SmallMistral Small 3.1
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index36.531.7
Released—2025-03-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—102K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.35
Output $ / M tokens—$0.56
Results tracked1928

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Coding12491309

Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Hard Prompts12401278
Chess Puzzles—1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.48

Math Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMistral Small 3.1
Omni-MATH29.6%24.8%
LMArena Math12471262
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.9%

Knowledge Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMistral Small 3.1
MMLU-Pro56.9%61%
GPQA (HELM)38.3%39.2%
LMArena Expert12511257
GPQA Diamond—41.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.0 H Small: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Vision—1136

Multilingual Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Non-English12161255
LMArena Chinese12491253
LMArena Russian12011263
LMArena Spanish12581283
LMArena French—1273
LMArena German—1266
LMArena Japanese—1208
LMArena Korean—1206

Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMistral Small 3.1
IFEval89%75%
LMArena Instruction Following12221264

Long Context Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Longer Query12421299

Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Text12411277
LMArena Creative Writing12111253
WildBench73.9%78.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn12421270
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—761

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Mistral Small 3.1?

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?

Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper