Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.1

Rank #266 Confirmed

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

35.9

Rank #213 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Granite 4.0 H Small in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 44.0 to 31.2.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Granite 4.0 H Small specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
ProviderIBMIBM
Noometry Index31.135.9
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#297), Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Coding11131247
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.0 (#227), Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Hard Prompts10921240

Math Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 30.3 (#211), Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Math11431251
Omni-MATH—29.6%

Knowledge Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#233), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Expert10871244
MMLU-Pro—56.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.2%
GPQA (HELM)—38.3%

Multilingual Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.4 (#271), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Non-English10371216
LMArena Chinese10631250
LMArena Russian10601198
LMArena Spanish—1258

Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.2 (#271), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Instruction Following10881221
IFEval—89%

Long Context Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#247), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Longer Query11221240

Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.2 (#280), Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Text10961241
LMArena Creative Writing10711210
LMArena Multi-Turn10631243
WildBench—73.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper