Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 7 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 68.7 to 54.2.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 31.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | 1025 |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1047 |
Math Too close to call
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1247 | 1072 |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | — |
Multilingual Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1063 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | 1060 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |
Long Context Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | 998 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | 1058 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?
Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.