Model comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 scores higher in 7 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads 52.2 to 31.6.

Side by side

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat specifications
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
ProviderNVIDIANVIDIA
Noometry Index36.731.8
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked119

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 38.4 (#177), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Coding13121025

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 15.7 (#149), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard10%—

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 26.3 (#134), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts13161047

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 37.5 (#152), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Math13601072

Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 43.1 (#187), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Non-English12821063
LMArena Russian1284—

Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 69.0 (#178), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Instruction Following13081060

Long Context Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 39.5 (#177), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Longer Query1299998

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 52.2 (#175), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Text13201098
LMArena Creative Writing13141091
LMArena Multi-Turn13171058

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper