Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs Llama 3.2 90B
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 29.3 to 10.4.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1247 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164), Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219), Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1244 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1250 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1198 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 89% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1221 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1240 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | — |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1243 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Llama 3.2 90B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.