Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs Mistral Medium
Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Medium in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Medium leads 28.1 to 11.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 39.4% for Llama 3.2 90B and 81.6% for Mistral Medium.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 36.3 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2023-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 8% |
| SciCode | — | 40.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.7% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1434 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 763.98 |
Agentic & Tool Use Llama 3.2 90B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 37.7% |
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning Mistral Medium leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 50% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1426 |
| DTBench | — | 75.5% |
| LMCA | — | 26.1% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 26.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math Mistral Medium leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | 32.2% |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | 81.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 9% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1408 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.3% |
Knowledge Mistral Medium leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | 59.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 4.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 22.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1408 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Mistral Medium leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | 1172 |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1447 |
| LMArena French | — | 1459 |
| LMArena German | — | 1432 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1380 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1433 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1398 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1406 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1418 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Mistral Medium?
Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Mistral Medium share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium has 36.