Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Granite 4.0 H Small
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 31.4 to 9.3.
- Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 36.5 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1249 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1240 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1247 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1251 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1222 |
| IFEval | — | 89% |
Long Context Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1242 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1211 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1242 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?
Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.