Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 28.5.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1487 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1474 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1489 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1534 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1467 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1464 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.