Model comparison
Hy3 vs Pixtral Large
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 32.9.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
- Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Hy3 | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 128K |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.13 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.53 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | — |
Reasoning Hy3 leads
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | — |
Math Not comparable
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hy3: —, Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | — |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena German | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than Pixtral Large?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Pixtral Large?
Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Pixtral Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.