Model comparison

Command R+ vs Hy3

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.0

Rank #251 Confirmed

Hy3 Tencent

43.6

Rank #79 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Hy3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.5 to 43.7.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command R+ and Hy3 specifications
Command R+Hy3
ProviderCohereTencent
Noometry Index32.043.6
Released2024-08-302026-07-06
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K262K
Max output4K128K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.13
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.53
Results tracked3417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

Command R+: 28.6 (#304), Hy3: 46.6 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hy3
LMArena Coding11871465
LMArena WebDev—1509
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Hy3 leads

Command R+: 8.9 (#341), Hy3: 25.0 (#134)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hy3
LMArena Hard Prompts11861449
SimpleBench17.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)—41.2%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.28—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Hy3 leads

Command R+: 26.6 (#239), Hy3: 37.4 (#98)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hy3
LMArena Math11881475
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Hy3 leads

Command R+: 35.9 (#165), Hy3: 40.2 (#108)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hy3
LMArena Expert11741461
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Command R+: 38.8 (#222), Hy3: 53.7 (#60)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hy3
LMArena Non-English12161427
LMArena Chinese12261496
LMArena French12081461
LMArena Korean11381390
LMArena Russian12271435
LMArena Spanish11891448
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

Command R+: 60.2 (#249), Hy3: 75.3 (#68)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hy3
LMArena Instruction Following11971425
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Hy3 leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#214), Hy3: 44.1 (#70)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hy3
LMArena Longer Query12311443

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Command R+: 43.7 (#223), Hy3: 62.5 (#75)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hy3
LMArena Text12291442
LMArena Creative Writing12351399
LMArena Multi-Turn12131436
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Hy3?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Hy3?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Hy3 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper