Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Hy3
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
TencentSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Hy3 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Hy3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 44.2 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2026-07-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0825 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.33 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Hy3: 46.8 (#63)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1508 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1464 |
Reasoning Hy3 leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Hy3: 26.1 (#136)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1447 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Hy3: 40.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1475 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Hy3: 40.8 (#114)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1460 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Hy3: 53.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1493 |
| LMArena French | — | 1461 |
| LMArena German | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1432 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |
Instruction Following Hy3 leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Hy3: 75.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1426 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Hy3: 44.1 (#75)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Hy3: 62.2 (#81)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1436 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Hy3?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Hy3 share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.