Model comparison

Hy3 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

43.6

Rank #79 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hy3 leads 25.0 to 20.0.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $2.80 / $8.40 for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct.
  • Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Hy3 and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct specifications
Hy3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.629.4
Released2026-07-062024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K131K
Max output128K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.13$2.80
Output $ / M tokens$0.53$8.40
Results tracked176

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Hy3: 46.6 (#60), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena WebDev1509—
LMArena Coding1465—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy3: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.4 (#136)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
OSWorld—5%

Reasoning Hy3 leads

Hy3: 25.0 (#134), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.0 (#228)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36%
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1449—

Math Not comparable

Hy3: 37.4 (#98), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Math1475—

Knowledge Not comparable

Hy3: 40.2 (#108), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Expert1461—

Multimodal Not comparable

Hy3: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 32.9 (#92)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Vision—1107
Video-MME—73.5%
GeoBench—62%
SpatialViz-Bench—33.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

Hy3: 53.7 (#60), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1427—
LMArena Chinese1496—
LMArena French1461—
LMArena Korean1390—
LMArena Russian1435—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hy3: 75.3 (#68), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1425—

Long Context Not comparable

Hy3: 44.1 (#70), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1443—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hy3: 62.5 (#75), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Text1442—
LMArena Creative Writing1399—
LMArena Multi-Turn1436—

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct lists at $2.80 and $8.40.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper