Model comparison

Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.1

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

43.6

Rank #79 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.1 MiniMax

38.4

Rank #177 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax-M2.1 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hy3 leads 25.0 to 15.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 41.2% for Hy3 and 11.2% for MiniMax-M2.1.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.1.
  • Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.

Side by side

Hy3 and MiniMax-M2.1 specifications
Hy3MiniMax-M2.1
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index43.638.4
Released2026-07-062025-12-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K205K
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.13$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.53$1.20
Results tracked1722

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

Hy3: 46.6 (#60), MiniMax-M2.1: 40.1 (#132)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena WebDev15091384
LMArena Coding14651421
ALE-Bench—623.83

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy3: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 27.7 (#91)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.1
Terminal-Bench—36.6%

Reasoning Hy3 leads

Hy3: 25.0 (#134), MiniMax-M2.1: 15.8 (#301)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.1
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%11.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts14491410

Math Hy3 leads

Hy3: 37.4 (#98), MiniMax-M2.1: 35.6 (#142)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Math14751396

Knowledge Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.2 (#108), MiniMax-M2.1: 37.7 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Expert14611432
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.8%

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Hy3: 53.7 (#60), MiniMax-M2.1: 50.2 (#123)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Non-English14271378
LMArena Chinese14961430
LMArena French14611405
LMArena Korean13901297
LMArena Russian14351386
LMArena Spanish14481396
LMArena German—1380
LMArena Japanese—1287

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

Hy3: 75.3 (#68), MiniMax-M2.1: 74.0 (#108)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Instruction Following14251399

Long Context Too close to call

Hy3: 44.1 (#70), MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#98)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Longer Query14431416

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Hy3: 62.5 (#75), MiniMax-M2.1: 58.5 (#114)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Text14421392
LMArena Creative Writing13991362
LMArena Multi-Turn14361396

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than MiniMax-M2.1?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or MiniMax-M2.1?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.1 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is Hy3 or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper