Model comparison

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Hy3

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.1-Codex OpenAI

38.6

Rank #186 Reported

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher in 0 categories and Hy3 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy3 leads 40.1 to 30.3.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for GPT-5.1-Codex.
  • GPT-5.1-Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 262K.
  • Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.1-Codex and Hy3 specifications
GPT-5.1-CodexHy3
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index38.644.2
Released2025-11-122026-07-06
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K262K
Max output128K128K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.0825
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.33
Results tracked619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.9 (#116), Hy3: 46.8 (#63)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
LMArena WebDev13371508
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66%—
LMArena Coding—1464
ALE-Bench1,245—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: 38.0 (#33), Hy3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
Terminal-Bench60.4%—
METR Time Horizons70.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hy3: 26.1 (#136)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
NYT Connections (extended)—41.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1447

Math Hy3 leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 30.3 (#235), Hy3: 40.1 (#93)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
ProofBench9%—
LMArena Math—1475

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hy3: 40.8 (#114)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
LMArena Expert—1460

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hy3: 53.5 (#65)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
LMArena Non-English—1426
LMArena Chinese—1493
LMArena French—1461
LMArena German—1439
LMArena Japanese—1392
LMArena Korean—1395
LMArena Russian—1432
LMArena Spanish—1456

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hy3: 75.1 (#70)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
LMArena Instruction Following—1426

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hy3: 44.1 (#75)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
LMArena Longer Query—1442

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hy3: 62.2 (#81)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
LMArena Text—1439
LMArena Creative Writing—1402
LMArena Multi-Turn—1436

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Hy3?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Hy3?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is GPT-5.1-Codex or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 41.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.1-Codex does, with 400K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex and Hy3 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex has 6 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper