Model comparison
Hy3 vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $0.19 / $1.13 for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Qwen3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hy3 | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0825 | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.33 | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1475 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | — |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena German | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Qwen3.6 Flash?
Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Flash lists at $0.19 and $1.13.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.6 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.