Model comparison

Hy3 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Hy3 and Kimi K2.7 Code score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.2 vs 43.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2.7 Code in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 39.0 to 26.1.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.

Side by side

Hy3 and Kimi K2.7 Code specifications
Hy3Kimi K2.7 Code
ProviderTencentMoonshot AI
Noometry Index44.243.3
Released2026-07-062026-06-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output128K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.13$0.95
Output $ / M tokens$0.53$4
Results tracked1919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena WebDev15081473
DeepSWE—30.5%
FrontierCode—30.1%
SciCode—47.5%
WeirdML—54.1%
LMArena Coding1464—
ALE-Bench—886.23

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy3: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Kimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents—37.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—5,083

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Kimi K2.7 Code
SimpleBench—57.9%
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%—
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts1447—
Surface Evolver Bench—48.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.97

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Kimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—54%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
LMArena Math1475—

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Kimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
SimpleQA Verified—36.5%
LMArena Expert1460—

Multilingual Not comparable

Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English1426—
LMArena Chinese1493—
LMArena French1461—
LMArena German1439—
LMArena Japanese1392—
LMArena Korean1395—
LMArena Russian1432—
LMArena Spanish1456—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Instruction Following1426—

Long Context Not comparable

Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Longer Query1442—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text1439—
LMArena Creative Writing1402—
LMArena Multi-Turn1436—

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Hy3 and Kimi K2.7 Code score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.2 vs 43.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

Is Hy3 or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 42.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper