Model comparison
Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hy3 leads 46.6 to 41.8.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B.
- Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Hy3 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Max output | 128K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.13 | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.53 | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Hy3: 46.6 (#60), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 41.8 (#103)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1465 | 1438 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1509 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
Hy3: 25.0 (#134), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 28.1 (#92)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1449 | 1428 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
Math Hy3 leads
Hy3: 37.4 (#98), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 36.2 (#120)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1426 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Hy3: 40.2 (#108), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.6 (#120)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1461 | 1440 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hy3: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Hy3: 53.7 (#60), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 52.1 (#92)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1496 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | 1448 |
| LMArena Korean | 1390 | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | 1435 | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | 1427 |
| LMArena German | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1385 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Hy3: 75.3 (#68), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.4 (#95)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1425 | 1407 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hy3: 44.1 (#70), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#93)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1443 | 1420 |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Hy3: 62.5 (#75), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.4 (#94)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1442 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1399 | 1367 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1428 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?
Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B lists at $0.70 and $2.80.
Is Hy3 or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18.